New Tumblr policy prohibits blogs advocating self-harm, eating disorders

Thinspiration

www.prettythin.com

The marvellous thing about the Internet is the amazing diversity of opinions, creative ideas, insightful takes on different issues and the boundless potential for self-expression. When it comes to kids and risky activities, it’s also one its downfalls.

Parents and educators are often shocked to learn of the existence of pro-ana (pro-anorexia), pro-mia (pro-bulimia) and pro-cutting websites. Although these sites sometimes pretend to be support communities, their tips for hiding scars or discrete ways of vomiting up meals belie their underlying intent. And research has demonstrated that the images of skeletal bodies and open wounds serve as powerful triggers for young people struggling to stop these destructive behaviours.

It’s not just a matter of free expression. Health Canada data shows that eating disorders have the highest mortality rate of all mental illnesses, with somewhere between 10 and 20% of sufferers eventually dying from complications.

Educators often struggle with the way the Internet offers a much wider community of influence for kids than they used to have. It used to be that if your kids had a good group of friends, a supportive community and a good school, you might feel comforted about what they’d be exposed to. But Google has changed that, for good and for bad.

Which is one reason many are cheering Tumblr.com’s proposed new policy, which will prohibit blogs that promote self-harm. They are soliciting feedback and opinions, so I strongly urge you to read the following, check out the full explanation, and then email them your support (policy@tumblr.com).

1.  Implement a new policy against pro-self-harm blogs. Here’s draft language we are planning to add to our Content Policy:

Active Promotion of Self-Harm.Don’t post content that actively promotes or glorifies self-injury or self-harm.  This includes content that urges or encourages readers to cut or mutilate themselves;  embrace anorexia, bulimia, or other eating disorders;  or commit suicide rather than, e.g., seek counseling or treatment for depression or other disorders.  Online dialogue about these acts and conditions is incredibly important;  this prohibition is intended to reach only those blogs that cross the line into active promotion or glorification.  For example, joking that you need to starve yourself after Thanksgiving or that you wanted to kill yourself after a humiliating date is fine, but recommending techniques for self-starvation or self-mutilation is not.We aim to begin implementing this policy next week.  Of course, we will allow any affected blogs a grace period in which to edit or download your content.

2.  Start showing PSAs on search results for related keywords. In addition, we plan to start posting “public service announcement”-style language whenever users search for tags that typically go along with pro-self-harm blogs.  For example, when a user searches for tags like “anorexia”, “anorexic”, “bulimia”, “bulimic”, “thinspiration”, “thinspo”, “proana”, “purge”, “purging”, etc., we would show PSA language like:

Eating disorders can cause serious health problems, and at their most severe can even be life-threatening. Please contact the [resource organization] at [helpline number] or [website].So that’s our plan.  We’d like your feedback.  If you have any comments or suggestions, please email them to policy@tumblr.com.

In other news, I’ve got a couple of blog posts in the works. One is about the wonderful day I spent at McGill University, hosted by the Centre for Educational Leadership (CEL), speaking with teachers and school administrators about bullying and other risky behaviours. I learned so much from these men and women and I look forward to sharing those stories. The second is about the fabulous presentation I heard from motivational speaker Scott Fried about the secret lives of teens.

   Send article as PDF   

Fighting bullying in schools takes planning, support, awareness

My editorial piece in today’s Montreal Gazette criticizes the Quebec government for taking the easy way out with its proposed anti-bullying legislation, Bill 56. Designed to appease parents, it also seems to place the blame on schools for not handling this complex issue properly. But lack of funding and resources, coupled with short-sighted, short-term solutions, have made it difficult for schools to deal with the problem of bullying.

Some of my suggestions from the editorial (you can read the full version here):

When the government asks our kids to “right their wrongs” (according to the  English slogan to be used in their planned $1 million ad campaign), I would ask  Beauchamp to consider doing the same. To give this antibullying legislation hope  of succeeding, she needs to consider some of the following things:

Help schools out with antibullying plan templates that have been developed  through best practices. Offer them resources assembled by a panel of experts  commissioned for this task. Schools can use these to put their plans together,  so it doesn’t become a costly (and ineffective) makework exercise for school  staff with no training in this area. Templates already exist for school  social-media policies, bullying prevention and handling policies.

Put money into support services. Bullying doesn’t happen in a vacuum. Bullies  need more than punishment – they need help to understand the consequences of  their actions and rehabilitate. They need consistent, patient support from  teachers, guidance counsellors and, sometimes, mental-health practitioners to  learn impulse control, good judgment, empathy and conflict resolution. The  students who are bullied often need help as well. Being labelled a victim can be  incredibly disempowering, and it’s likely these children were already  vulnerable. Ideally, these support services will be active in prevention:  teaching tolerance and conflict resolution, particularly for students identified  as at-risk for bullying or being bullied.

Invest in digital citizenship education. Banning Facebook on campus is the equivalent of sticking one’s head in the sand.  Since today’s bullies often make use of cellphones, email and social media,  students need to be taught how to use these powerful communication tools safely,  with respect, dignity and awareness.

Think long-term. Antibullying initiatives are too often knee-jerk responses  that don’t take social costs into account: reduced school performance,  psychological problems, impact on family members, health-care costs, legal costs  and schoolyard bullies who grow up to become workplace bullies. If the  government is serious about using our tax dollars to right the wrongs, they need  to move from these reactive policy inoculations to innovative long-term  thinking.

   Send article as PDF   

“Bullying and Other Risky Behaviours” – McGill workshop for teachers & school personnel

Are you a k-6 teacher, school librarian, psychologist, guidance counsellor or principal concerned about bullying and risky behaviours? Check out my Feb. 23rd workshop, part of McGill University’s Distinguished Educator’s Seminar Series through the Centre for Educational Leadership:

“Protecting students from high-risk activities should begin as early as kindergarten. It’s never too early and rarely too late to build resilience in students by teaching strategies for dealing with conflict and the temptations of high-risk activities.”

McGill Flyer p.1

Mcgill seminar flyer p.2

   Send article as PDF